Saturday, November 01, 2008

Proposition 8 is Constitutional: Marriage is not a "Fundamental Right"

In this article, I would simply like to point out the absurdity of the most publicized argument against Proposition 8 on the November 4, 2008 ballot. The main argument against Proposition 8 is that it "would eliminate fundamental rights for a group of Californians." The purpose of this article is to point out the fact that State-sanctioned marriage is not a "right" to be found in the U.S. or the California constitutions. The definition of it is only something that we agree upon as a society, not something that we have forced upon us by a noisy minority or a handful of judges. Either the opponents of Prop. 8 are naive enough to believe they have the power to bestow "fundamental rights" upon whomever they wish or they understand that the right to marriage does not exist and they're intentionally misleading voters. All I'm asking for is a little bit of intellectual honesty in our argument here. That's all.

So where do the opponents of Prop. 8 and the California Supreme Court think they see the right to state-sanctioned marriage in our constitution? Don't tell me that we all have the right to pursue "happiness". That argument is nonsense. It makes some people "happy" to have more than one wife at a time, yet we're perfectly happy to restrict marriage from that. We the people have the right to decide on the laws under which we chose to live and thus have the right to define marriage any way we want to define it.

The original protection of marriage act, Proposition 22, was passed by the voters of the state of California in the 2000 election. The language was exactly the same as the language used for Proposition 8, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California." The original Prop. 22, which was struck down by the California Supreme Court by a vote of 4-3 on May 14, 2008, was deemed unconstitutional - by FOUR people! - because these FOUR people think that the equal protection clause of the California Constitution was violated (I stress the language "four people" simply because, whether these people have a title or not, they're still simply people, citizens of the State of California, just like you and me, and many of us are equally capable of interpreting the language of a document). Let's examine:

Prop. 22: "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."

Article 1, Section 3.4 CA State Constitution: "Nothing in this subdivision supersedes or modifies any provision of this Constitution, including the guarantees that a person may not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, or denied equal protection of the laws, as provided in Section 7."

I don't know how this can be interpreted any other way - unless your personal biases cause you to see what you want to see. Prop. 22 became California law in 2000 as a result of a legitimate vote by the citizens of the state. The US and CA constitutions simply state that all citizens are entitled to equal protection under the law. Prop. 22 treats every citizen of California in exactly the same manner. Every man is treated equally and every woman is treated equally under this law. None of us is allowed to marry anyone else of the same sex. Every single citizen of the state must follow the same rule. Therefore, the law clearly does not discriminate against any person. A heterosexual man cannot marry another man any more than a homosexual man can and a heterosexual woman cannot marry another woman any more than a homosexual woman can.

Now, if the law's language was, for example, "Only marriage between two people who are in love with each other is valid or recognized in California, unless the people in question are homosexual.", then you could correctly argue that the statute is discriminatory. This law would be unconstitutional because it would not allow any homosexual person to be married to anyone else - not someone of the opposite sex and same sexual orientation, nor someone of the same sex and sexual orientation, nor opposite sex and opposite sexual orientation. This law would discriminate between a heterosexual and a homosexual and treat the two differently under the law. However, under the law established by Prop. 22 and Prop. 8 (if it passes) a hetero or homosexual man will be allowed to marry a hetero or homosexual woman and vice versa. So under the proposed law, the state does not make any differentiation between hetero and homosexual people and therefore cannot be accused of being discriminatory and/or unconstitutional.

If the majority of the citizens of California wants to change the definition of marriage in this election, then so be it. But don't tell me that if I vote 'yes' on Prop. 8 that I'm taking "fundamental rights" away from anybody. Rights that never existed in the first place cannot be stripped.

41 Comments:

Blogger ElroyTLanphear said...

999成人性站高雄視訊北部人聊天室性愛貼圖85cc成人片美女交友真人美女辣妹鋼管秀視訊交友90739成人貼圖區a片貼圖哈啦聊天室鴛鴦吧成人成人動漫美女寫真av成人網6k聊天館f罩杯美女圖片成人網ut女同聊天室情色貼圖區

2:26 PM  
Blogger 裕瑤 said...

果然是好文章 受益良多 感謝分享 ̄ 3 ̄........................................

2:09 AM  
Blogger 太可怕 said...

上來打聲招呼,祝你一切平安!........................................

1:31 AM  
Blogger 于毓 said...

新的一天 祝你有所成長~~ ....................................................

8:29 AM  
Blogger 佳玲曉豪 said...

很喜歡你的blog哦...加油唷 ........................................

11:25 PM  
Blogger 童紫勳 said...

但行好事,莫問前程. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

12:55 AM  
Blogger PorshaCoghlan梁子珠 said...

失去金錢的人,失去很多;失去朋友的人,失去更多;失去信心的人,失去所有。......................................................

10:45 AM  
Blogger Syll0228vesterGetchel said...

唯有穿鞋的人,才知道鞋的哪一處擠腳......................................................

1:34 AM  
Blogger 家銘 said...

生、死、窮、達,不易其操。 ..................................................

7:53 AM  
Blogger 吉水 said...

人間好話,要如海綿遇水牢牢吸住 ..................................................

3:33 AM  
Blogger 佐志 said...

天下沒有走不通的路,沒有克服不了的困難,沒有打不敗的敵人。........................................

8:33 PM  
Blogger HaydeeG_Mccra鈺苓 said...

閒來無聊逛逛blog~~跟您打聲招呼~~.............................................

4:29 PM  
Blogger 智宜智宜 said...

免費av成人電影線上免費成人網gogo成人影片a成人短片尼克成人電影成人a免費成人dvd下載成人dvd免費看成人go成人go2成人hbo成人kk俱樂部成人人圖成人大全成人片a片成人片gogo成人片gogosex成人卡通色情片白虎圖庫尼可成人網弘爺論壇打非打非機專用網打炮論壇打飛機專區打砲遊戲打砲網站本土付費av本土成人直播本土自拍小弟弟金瓶梅影片 自拍俱樂部 小高聊天室ol制服美女影片

1:30 AM  
Blogger 柏懿綺辰 said...

你不能改變容貌~~但你可以展現笑容..................................................

7:10 PM  
Blogger Re弘娟neS_Seely0216弘娟 said...

從來愛都不知它的深度,非得等到別離的時候..................................................

1:28 AM  
Blogger huntb said...

如果你不思考未來,你便不會有未來..............................

5:23 PM  
Blogger 燕延 said...

成人線上卡通 視訊網 正妹聊天 免費成人圖 交友援 av女優寫真貼圖 漫畫性感美女 微風線上影片 自拍.偷拍 ut聊聊天室 成人視訊 情趣用品 18禁卡通遊戲 巨乳美少女 咆曉小咾鼠影城 免費a片 線上觀看情色影片 免費線上觀看色情 一夜情人 383成人影音成 sexygirl 裸照 虐待美女 辣妹寫真集dvd 淫亂人妻日記 歐美熟女色情圖片 免費視訊 空姐圖貼 69成人a圖下載 微風寫真館 85cc影 微風論壇情色 嘟嘟 xo777 情色性愛貼圖 台北援交網 嘟嘟情色網 鋼管秀 下載av 洪爺娛樂往 台灣大奶影片 sexy888影片分享區 下載 巨乳人妻初體驗h漫 台灣性愛文學網 後宮18jack 限制級國片 0204成人 免費性愛觀看 走光

5:18 AM  
Blogger 林志宏 said...

幸福不是一切,人還有責任。....................................................................

1:46 AM  
Blogger 萱祥 said...

生存乃是不斷地在內心與靈魂交戰;寫作是坐著審判自己。......................................................................

6:08 AM  
Blogger 于庭 said...

成熟,就是有能力適應生活中的模糊。.................................................................

1:14 AM  
Blogger 芸茂芸茂 said...

向著星球長驅直進的人,反比踟躕在峽路上的人,更容易達到目的。............................................................

4:25 AM  
Blogger 佩璇佩璇 said...

每次看完你的文章,總是回味許久,要經常發表喔。..................................................................

6:15 PM  
Blogger JasonBirk佳琪 said...

唯有穿鞋的人,才知道鞋的哪一處擠腳............................................................

6:28 PM  
Blogger 建佑建佑 said...

來幫忙拼人氣~Go Go Go..................................................................

5:48 PM  
Blogger 吳婷婷 said...

朋友是一面鏡子............................................................

10:02 PM  
Blogger 香昱信張君林 said...

生命所經歷的折磨愈多,其所產生的奮鬥力愈大。............................................................

6:47 AM  
Blogger 吳婷婷 said...

好多很有用資訊...感謝你的分享喔............................................................

9:27 PM  
Blogger 紹函紹函 said...

No garden without its weeds.............................................................

5:13 AM  
Blogger 玉苓玉苓 said...

河水永遠是相同的,可是每一剎那又都是新的。..................................................

11:48 PM  
Blogger d1gd21g231g21s said...

Learning makes life sweet.

9:08 PM  
Blogger 黃信梅 said...

呵。。。。好可愛~~............................................................

9:53 PM  
Blogger GusF_Finkbeiner1蕙帆 said...

要在憂患恥辱的環境裡,創造我們自力更生的新生活。..................................................

1:07 AM  
Blogger 宛淑芳真 said...

臨淵羨魚,不如退而結網。.......................................................

6:51 AM  
Blogger 玄王季玄王季玄王季 said...

Pen and ink is wits plough. ............................................................

6:43 PM  
Blogger 偉曹琬 said...

很精彩的部落格 期待你的繼續加油..................................................

5:09 AM  
Blogger 怡靜怡靜怡靜怡雯 said...

讓好心情回味發酵;壞心情留在文字裡隨時間消逝吧!............................................................

8:05 PM  
Blogger 小草 said...

讓好心情回味發酵;壞心情留在文字裡隨時間消逝吧!............................................................

9:17 PM  
Blogger 陳欣陳玟珮陳玟珮琦 said...

天生我材必有用,千金散盡還復來。.. .. ............................................................

12:51 AM  
Blogger 翊翊翊翊張瑜翊翊翊 said...

傻氣的人喜歡給心 雖然每次都被笑了卻得到了別人的心..................................................................

7:06 AM  
Blogger 祁聿雨 said...

看著你的BLOG 好多朋友都回應 真厲害..................................................

10:42 PM  
Blogger 惠NorrisBradwell041花 said...

要持續更新下去喲!!期待~~............................................................

10:44 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home